Is film food for the soul?

“Used to be that artists in films were the likes of Vincent van Gogh (Lust for Life) and Michelangelo (The Agony and the Ecstasy), suffering and starving for their art,” writes Carrie Rickey. “Today’s artist in cinema is the chef (Babette’s Feast, The Big Night, Spanglish, Ratatouille and No Reservations.”

Rickey points out in her Philadelphia InquirerFlickgrrl blog, “Food is such an elastic metaphor that it can be stretched to embrace everything — from art to cannibalism, from capitalism to spiritual communion, from aphrodisiac to colonialism.”

So true.

So, by implication, food plays a role of its own when it’s presented in movies. And, in that role, it serves up special messages to moviegoers about living the good life and being good–or not.

What messages are food films really cooking up?

Rickey cites several examples:

  • Nelson Pereira dos Santos’ hilarious political allegory “How Tasty Was My Little Frenchman” depicts Brazilian Indians who resist colonization by eating the colonials.
  • In Luis Bunuel’s sly “The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie” gourmet food suggests capitalist consumption.
  • Gabriel Axel’s sublime Babette’s Feast (based on a story by Isak Dinesen) is about food as agent of religious revelation.
  • in Alfonso Arau’s “Like Water for Chocolate,” food is at once revolutionary, sensuous and emotional.
  • With these impressive titles in mind, can it be said that films about food are nourishment for the soul? Your thoughts?

    One Response to “Is film food for the soul?”

    1. Art Masters Says:

      I do like the colours used in The Café Terrace on the Place du Forum one of Van Gogh’s better works!

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>