<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AWFJ Women On Film - The Week In Women, June 12, 2009 - MaryAnn Johanson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GoKlavierKlavierFan</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7785</link>
		<dc:creator>GoKlavierKlavierFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7785</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;GoKlavierKlavierFan...&lt;/strong&gt;

Megacool Blog indeed!... if anyone else has anything it would be much appreciated. Great website Enjoy!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>GoKlavierKlavierFan&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Megacool Blog indeed!&#8230; if anyone else has anything it would be much appreciated. Great website Enjoy!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Zanzie</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7694</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Zanzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7694</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan, it's kind of weird how Ms. Johanson keeps ignoring your comments, huh? Like you said: a coward has been exposed.

lol rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan, it&#8217;s kind of weird how Ms. Johanson keeps ignoring your comments, huh? Like you said: a coward has been exposed.</p>
<p>lol rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Kelly</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7453</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7453</guid>
		<description>Thank you for proving my point, Ms. Johanson. Enjoy disparaging amateur writers and cherry-picking arguments to fit into your shallow world-view founded on bias. You seem to be quite skilled at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for proving my point, Ms. Johanson. Enjoy disparaging amateur writers and cherry-picking arguments to fit into your shallow world-view founded on bias. You seem to be quite skilled at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryAnn Johanson</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7448</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryAnn Johanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7448</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Adam, I've been busy being beautiful and misunderstood, and ugly and lonely. One or the other.

Thanks for the psychoanalysis. You saved me a fortune in therapy bills this month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Adam, I&#8217;ve been busy being beautiful and misunderstood, and ugly and lonely. One or the other.</p>
<p>Thanks for the psychoanalysis. You saved me a fortune in therapy bills this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7447</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7447</guid>
		<description>I haven’t felt so… dismissed and invisible in ages.Oh good lord. If you actually think Ryan's comment was a &lt;i&gt;serious&lt;/i&gt; admission to a previously held ignorance (rather than a cute statement about the presence of a largely forgotten, unheard voice, which includes his blog's co-writer Emily), then your bullsh*t detector is on the fritz. Chill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven’t felt so… dismissed and invisible in ages.Oh good lord. If you actually think Ryan&#8217;s comment was a <i>serious</i> admission to a previously held ignorance (rather than a cute statement about the presence of a largely forgotten, unheard voice, which includes his blog&#8217;s co-writer Emily), then your bullsh*t detector is on the fritz. Chill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Kelly</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7445</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7445</guid>
		<description>Is it any surprise that Ms. Johanson refuses to continue this thread any longer? Marilyn and Miranda, two wonderful writers with strong feminist values, have come to my defense (and thank you both so very much for that--- I think of both of you as friends and admire you both so highly, and it's touching that you both think so highy of me). This doesn't seem to fit into the equation Ms. Johanson laid out---in fact, it runs counter to her agenda.

So let me see if I understand this--- according to Ms. Johanson, it was 'unreasonable' of me to request that she simply adress her concerns with my post in the comment section of my blog, where I could have responded to them and sorted out any misunderstanding (though something tells me Ms. Johanson would rather grind an axe than bury the hatchet). However, it's also 'unreasonable' of me to expect her to continue the debate in the PUBLIC FORUM that she slandered me in (and being associated with these sexist sleazeballs &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; slander). 

Of course she was willing to engage in debate with Adam, who proved himself to be every bit as immature and misogynist as Ms. Johanson presumed. Anything that runs counter to her sexist generalizations is roundly ignored. 

I'd say we have exposed a coward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it any surprise that Ms. Johanson refuses to continue this thread any longer? Marilyn and Miranda, two wonderful writers with strong feminist values, have come to my defense (and thank you both so very much for that&#8212; I think of both of you as friends and admire you both so highly, and it&#8217;s touching that you both think so highy of me). This doesn&#8217;t seem to fit into the equation Ms. Johanson laid out&#8212;in fact, it runs counter to her agenda.</p>
<p>So let me see if I understand this&#8212; according to Ms. Johanson, it was &#8216;unreasonable&#8217; of me to request that she simply adress her concerns with my post in the comment section of my blog, where I could have responded to them and sorted out any misunderstanding (though something tells me Ms. Johanson would rather grind an axe than bury the hatchet). However, it&#8217;s also &#8216;unreasonable&#8217; of me to expect her to continue the debate in the PUBLIC FORUM that she slandered me in (and being associated with these sexist sleazeballs <i>is</i> slander). </p>
<p>Of course she was willing to engage in debate with Adam, who proved himself to be every bit as immature and misogynist as Ms. Johanson presumed. Anything that runs counter to her sexist generalizations is roundly ignored. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say we have exposed a coward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarcasm Jokes &#124; The OriginalUnOriginal.Com</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7441</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarcasm Jokes &#124; The OriginalUnOriginal.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7441</guid>
		<description>[...] AWFJ Women On Film - The Week In Women, June 12, 2009 - MaryAnn &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AWFJ Women On Film - The Week In Women, June 12, 2009 - MaryAnn &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda Wilding</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7438</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda Wilding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7438</guid>
		<description>Let me first say that I'm thrilled to post my comment after the truly magnificent Marilyn Ferdinand (of FERDY ON FILMS).

Like me, she's a committed feminist (who adores men). No holds barred. Takes no prisoners. Doesn't suffer fools gladly...and she's one hell of an amazing writer on top of all that. 

Ms. Johanson, you make a lot of valid points that I do not disagree with. 

AT ALL. 

But I fear you lost me when you took Ryan Kelly (of the utterly fabulous MEDFLY QUARANTINE) to task. 

Yes, Ryan is only 20. But he has wisdom and great sensitivity far beyond his years. He not only visits my site CINEMATIC PASSIONS on a regular basis, but he's a very good friend of mine. 

From the beginning, I wanted my site to express my progressive attitudes about feminism along with the principles that are precious to me. I feel that it has succeeded in that regard. 

I don't think that my love of old Hollywood glamour runs counter to that. (That was the era, after all, where female actors had wickedly powerful leading roles and were able to go to the wall with them.) As long as no one is exploited, I'm good with it. 

Certainly there are men that are complete idiots whose attitudes towards women are sad at best and reprehensible at worst. But Ryan CAN NOT be lumped in with sleazeball jackasses such as that. 

Ryan and I have had many discussions at my site regarding women. He is ALWAYS unfailingly polite and exceptionally respectful. He actually refers to himself as a feminist and those principles mean something to him. 

We both have Irish backgrounds. Our wits have been known to be drier than the Sahara on various occasions. 

When he made that quip that you're referring to, I can assure you that that was a joke. But it may not have struck someone that way if they didn't know him well. 

So please feel free to peruse MEDFLY QUARANTINE at your leisure with no underlying resentment. 

Trust me. Ryan's one of the good guys. 

I feel very honoured that he would refer to me as one of his favourite film bloggers.

He's certainly one of mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me first say that I&#8217;m thrilled to post my comment after the truly magnificent Marilyn Ferdinand (of FERDY ON FILMS).</p>
<p>Like me, she&#8217;s a committed feminist (who adores men). No holds barred. Takes no prisoners. Doesn&#8217;t suffer fools gladly&#8230;and she&#8217;s one hell of an amazing writer on top of all that. </p>
<p>Ms. Johanson, you make a lot of valid points that I do not disagree with. </p>
<p>AT ALL. </p>
<p>But I fear you lost me when you took Ryan Kelly (of the utterly fabulous MEDFLY QUARANTINE) to task. </p>
<p>Yes, Ryan is only 20. But he has wisdom and great sensitivity far beyond his years. He not only visits my site CINEMATIC PASSIONS on a regular basis, but he&#8217;s a very good friend of mine. </p>
<p>From the beginning, I wanted my site to express my progressive attitudes about feminism along with the principles that are precious to me. I feel that it has succeeded in that regard. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that my love of old Hollywood glamour runs counter to that. (That was the era, after all, where female actors had wickedly powerful leading roles and were able to go to the wall with them.) As long as no one is exploited, I&#8217;m good with it. </p>
<p>Certainly there are men that are complete idiots whose attitudes towards women are sad at best and reprehensible at worst. But Ryan CAN NOT be lumped in with sleazeball jackasses such as that. </p>
<p>Ryan and I have had many discussions at my site regarding women. He is ALWAYS unfailingly polite and exceptionally respectful. He actually refers to himself as a feminist and those principles mean something to him. </p>
<p>We both have Irish backgrounds. Our wits have been known to be drier than the Sahara on various occasions. </p>
<p>When he made that quip that you&#8217;re referring to, I can assure you that that was a joke. But it may not have struck someone that way if they didn&#8217;t know him well. </p>
<p>So please feel free to peruse MEDFLY QUARANTINE at your leisure with no underlying resentment. </p>
<p>Trust me. Ryan&#8217;s one of the good guys. </p>
<p>I feel very honoured that he would refer to me as one of his favourite film bloggers.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s certainly one of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda Wilding</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7436</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda Wilding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7436</guid>
		<description>I'm rarely late to the party. 

Unless I want to make the classic actors' entrance.

Christ, that red is hard on the eyes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m rarely late to the party. </p>
<p>Unless I want to make the classic actors&#8217; entrance.</p>
<p>Christ, that red is hard on the eyes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/06/12/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-june-12-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7430</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3328#comment-7430</guid>
		<description>Ryan - Even though you didn't mention me as one of your favorite bloggers, I am coming to your defense. I thought your comment about girls blogging, too, was a hoot and definitely a compliment. I'm sorry you got caught in the shrapnel of this commenters anger (not misplaced for the most part, I might add).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan - Even though you didn&#8217;t mention me as one of your favorite bloggers, I am coming to your defense. I thought your comment about girls blogging, too, was a hoot and definitely a compliment. I&#8217;m sorry you got caught in the shrapnel of this commenters anger (not misplaced for the most part, I might add).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

