<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AWFJ Women On Film - The Week in Women, July 24, 2009 - MaryAnn Johanson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awfj.org/2009/07/24/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-july-24-2009-maryann-johanson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awfj.org/2009/07/24/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-july-24-2009-maryann-johanson/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Funny People: Douthat and Apatow Break Our Kettle and Want us to Buy it Back &#171; zunguzungu</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/07/24/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-july-24-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7585</link>
		<dc:creator>Funny People: Douthat and Apatow Break Our Kettle and Want us to Buy it Back &#171; zunguzungu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3591#comment-7585</guid>
		<description>[...] have enough trees. Which is why I’m glad Millicent wrote what she did; as many people have pointed out, rightly, the movie exemplifies the worst of Apatow’s knee-jerk misogyny, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have enough trees. Which is why I’m glad Millicent wrote what she did; as many people have pointed out, rightly, the movie exemplifies the worst of Apatow’s knee-jerk misogyny, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWFJ Women on Film - The Week in Women, July 31, 2009 - MaryAnn Johanson - Alliance of Women Film Journalists -</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/07/24/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-july-24-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7556</link>
		<dc:creator>AWFJ Women on Film - The Week in Women, July 31, 2009 - MaryAnn Johanson - Alliance of Women Film Journalists -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3591#comment-7556</guid>
		<description>[...] AWFJ Women On Film - The Week in Women, July 24, 2009 - MaryAnn Johanson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AWFJ Women On Film - The Week in Women, July 24, 2009 - MaryAnn Johanson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newbs</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/07/24/awfj-women-on-film-the-week-in-women-july-24-2009-maryann-johanson/#comment-7549</link>
		<dc:creator>Newbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=3591#comment-7549</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite="MaryAnn"&gt;But if Heigl thinks all it takes for a movie to be “grownup” is a few swear words… well, I see now how she could have agreed to go along with this.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, hey... it's not necessarily Heigl that thinks this about movies. It's the MPAA. When a film can get an "R" for saying "fuck" more than once (regardless of the amount of violence on screen, for example (see: &lt;i&gt;The Dark Knight&lt;/i&gt;)) there's a cog missing from the Hollywood machine. It's not language that makes a film grown up, sure, but you can't fault an actor for using the concept as shorthand for grown up films, since it often seems to be the only criteria for a "grown up" rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="MaryAnn"><p>But if Heigl thinks all it takes for a movie to be “grownup” is a few swear words… well, I see now how she could have agreed to go along with this.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, hey&#8230; it&#8217;s not necessarily Heigl that thinks this about movies. It&#8217;s the MPAA. When a film can get an &#8220;R&#8221; for saying &#8220;fuck&#8221; more than once (regardless of the amount of violence on screen, for example (see: <i>The Dark Knight</i>)) there&#8217;s a cog missing from the Hollywood machine. It&#8217;s not language that makes a film grown up, sure, but you can&#8217;t fault an actor for using the concept as shorthand for grown up films, since it often seems to be the only criteria for a &#8220;grown up&#8221; rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

