<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AWFJ Women On Film - The Week In Women, November 13, 2009 - MaryAnn Johanson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awfj.org/2009/11/14/4103/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awfj.org/2009/11/14/4103/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/11/14/4103/#comment-8005</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=4103#comment-8005</guid>
		<description>It must be hard to interview someone like Megan Fox or Robert Patinson.  If they are sex symbols, then what else is there to talk about? Their opinions? The only things they are qualified to talk about are the careers as sex symbols.  I did hear about one of the early supermodels who was remarkably qualified to discuss engineering, but how many fashion magazine readers want to read about that? A Korean fashion model was also a Master level "go" player, but that would make for lousy TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be hard to interview someone like Megan Fox or Robert Patinson.  If they are sex symbols, then what else is there to talk about? Their opinions? The only things they are qualified to talk about are the careers as sex symbols.  I did hear about one of the early supermodels who was remarkably qualified to discuss engineering, but how many fashion magazine readers want to read about that? A Korean fashion model was also a Master level &#8220;go&#8221; player, but that would make for lousy TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

