<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AWFJ Women On Film - The Week In Women, December 5, 2009 - MaryAnn Johanson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awfj.org/2009/12/05/4153/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awfj.org/2009/12/05/4153/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bzero</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/12/05/4153/#comment-8105</link>
		<dc:creator>Bzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=4153#comment-8105</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"Among the new wide releases this week, Natalie Portman makes the very best of a limited role — as a miltary wife and mother to two small children — in &lt;i&gt;Brothers&lt;/i&gt;..."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, but does she have any girl-on-girl kissing scenes?  &#62;B)

*runs away fast*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Among the new wide releases this week, Natalie Portman makes the very best of a limited role — as a miltary wife and mother to two small children — in <i>Brothers</i>&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, but does she have any girl-on-girl kissing scenes?  &gt;B)</p>
<p>*runs away fast*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/12/05/4153/#comment-8092</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=4153#comment-8092</guid>
		<description>I think Patrica Clarkson is somewhat lucky as she has always looked like a woman. She's never looked like a girl, so she's always played proper mature grown -ups, thank God.  I think she looks fantastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Patrica Clarkson is somewhat lucky as she has always looked like a woman. She&#8217;s never looked like a girl, so she&#8217;s always played proper mature grown -ups, thank God.  I think she looks fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/12/05/4153/#comment-8089</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=4153#comment-8089</guid>
		<description>Fat has a subculture? I've been fat most of my life and I never noticed a subculture.  I just hung out with other, thinner, more accepting people at Rocky Horror with my D&#38;D buddies.  A subculture would need its own music, and I can only think of one song about being fat, and its only literature, and I can only think of one book specifically about a fat person.

And Sci Fi Wire is a thinly disguised advertising arm of SyFy; any actual news is incidental, however welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fat has a subculture? I&#8217;ve been fat most of my life and I never noticed a subculture.  I just hung out with other, thinner, more accepting people at Rocky Horror with my D&amp;D buddies.  A subculture would need its own music, and I can only think of one song about being fat, and its only literature, and I can only think of one book specifically about a fat person.</p>
<p>And Sci Fi Wire is a thinly disguised advertising arm of SyFy; any actual news is incidental, however welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogerBW</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/12/05/4153/#comment-8087</link>
		<dc:creator>RogerBW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=4153#comment-8087</guid>
		<description>Well, of course SyFy would say that. If you find it anything other than titillating, then by definition you're not in the demographic they care about: mindless perpetual adolescent boys who will sit passively in front of anything that has "sci-fi" on the label and the promise (usually broken) of tits.

Always remember that in commercial television the audience is the product; the purchaser is the advertiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, of course SyFy would say that. If you find it anything other than titillating, then by definition you&#8217;re not in the demographic they care about: mindless perpetual adolescent boys who will sit passively in front of anything that has &#8220;sci-fi&#8221; on the label and the promise (usually broken) of tits.</p>
<p>Always remember that in commercial television the audience is the product; the purchaser is the advertiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alma</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/12/05/4153/#comment-8084</link>
		<dc:creator>Alma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=4153#comment-8084</guid>
		<description>"the story is, as most movies aimed at the mainstream are, all about a man’s road to change, with women in supporting roles that foster that growth."

Thanks for saying this. I notice this all the time and it's so nice to know that other people think about this stuff besides myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the story is, as most movies aimed at the mainstream are, all about a man’s road to change, with women in supporting roles that foster that growth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for saying this. I notice this all the time and it&#8217;s so nice to know that other people think about this stuff besides myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2009/12/05/4153/#comment-8082</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=4153#comment-8082</guid>
		<description>"among the new wide releases this week, Natalie Portman makes the very best of a limited role..." 

Shouldn't we boycott Natalie Portman considering she reportedly signed the Free Roman Polanski petition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;among the new wide releases this week, Natalie Portman makes the very best of a limited role&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t we boycott Natalie Portman considering she reportedly signed the Free Roman Polanski petition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

