<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alliance of Women Film Journalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awfj.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awfj.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - &#8220;Salt&#8221; - Review by Susan Granger</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-salt-review-by-susan-granger/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-salt-review-by-susan-granger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Susan Granger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews and Criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[angelina jolie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[salt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[susan granger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie could turn out to be the #1 action star in the world. She’s that good in a
role written for Tom Cruise but rejected by him as being too similar to that of Ethan Hunt
in the “Mission Impossible” franchise. She’s a top-notch CIA agent who is accused of
being a Russian spy and goes on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelina Jolie could turn out to be the #1 action star in the world. She’s that good in a<br />
role written for Tom Cruise but rejected by him as being too similar to that of Ethan Hunt<br />
in the “Mission Impossible” franchise.<span id="more-5073"></span> She’s a top-notch CIA agent who is accused of<br />
being a Russian spy and goes on the run in order to figure out who set her up.<br />
As the tense political thriller begins, Evelyn Salt (Jolie) is being tortured in a<br />
North Korean prison. Then, escorted by CIA colleague Ted Winter (Liev Schreiber),<br />
she’s ‘exchanged’ at the border and reunited with her husband, a German arachnologist<br />
(August Diehl). Some time later, back in Washington, she’s suddenly accused of being a<br />
sleeper spy by Orlov (Daniel Olbrychski), a Russian defector who claims she was planted<br />
in the U.S. many years earlier by the Soviets as part of an elaborate plan to assassinate<br />
the Russian president on a visit to New York and take over the American government.<br />
Fearing for her husband’s life as well as her own, ever-resourceful Salt flees - with agents<br />
Winter and Peabody (Chiwetel Ejiofor) in hot pursuit, as a myriad of misinformation and<br />
espionage double-crosses cloud the true identity and purpose of Evelyn Salt.<br />
Having written the character as Edwin A. Salt, screenwriters Kurt Wimmer, and Brian<br />
Helgeland and director Phillip Noyce (“Patriot Games,” “Clear and Present Danger”) not<br />
only juggled the gender switch but also engaged stunt coordinator Simon Crane (“Lara<br />
Croft: Tomb Raider,” “Mr. &#038; Mrs. Smith”) who coached Jolie in Muay Thai martial arts<br />
and the Israeli grappling technique known as Krav Maga. According to Crane, Jolie’s an<br />
expert driver, rides motorcycles superbly and has no fear of heights, rendering the pulse-<br />
racing aerobatics more plausible than the plot. Yet it’s too bad there’s no sense of humor<br />
With the recent real-life Russian spy swap still in the headlines, on the Granger Movie<br />
Gauge of 1 to 10, “Salt” is a timely, enigmatic 8, featuring Hollywood’s most alluring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-salt-review-by-susan-granger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - Elizabeth Allen Talks “Ramona and Beezus,” Filmmaking and Women In Hollywood - Jennifer Merin interviews</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-elizabeth-allen-talks-%e2%80%9cramona-and-beezus%e2%80%9d-filmmaking-and-women-in-hollywood-jennifer-merin-interviews/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-elizabeth-allen-talks-%e2%80%9cramona-and-beezus%e2%80%9d-filmmaking-and-women-in-hollywood-jennifer-merin-interviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Merin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews and Profiles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[beverly cleary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[elizabeth allen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[elizabeth gabler]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[family films]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jennifer merin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[kathryn bigelow]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ramona and beezus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[women directors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Ramona and Beezus,” based on Beverly Cleary’s beloved book, is likely to be the family film success of the summer season. The film is all about sisterhood and the love that develops between and binds siblings.
Cleary’s novel is a kids’ classic, so well-known and beloved, adapting it for the big screen could be problematic. Director [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Ramona and Beezus,” based on Beverly Cleary’s beloved book, is likely to be the family film success of the summer season. The film is all about sisterhood and the love that develops between and binds siblings.</p>
<p>Cleary’s novel is a kids’ classic, so well-known and beloved, adapting it for the big screen could be problematic. Director Elizabeth Allen says she was actually quite concerned about doing it the right way &#8212; especially because she feels so personally connected to the book.<span id="more-5042"></span></p>
<p> <STRONG>ELIZABETH ALLEN:</STRONG>  Actually, I was very concerned about doing it the right way. The book has been a pivotal part of my life, ever since I was introduced to “Ramona and Beezus” when I was five and had the chicken pox. I Have a younger sister, too, so there’s really a lot that I relate to. In fact, I’m so familiar with the book that I’d have to say I suspect I often blur my own memories with those of Ramona. So, I considered it a big responsibility and I took a big pause before deciding to take the job because I wanted to figure out if I could work out the differences for film. I really didn‘t want to screw it up and wind up producing just another episode of “Dennis The Menace,” or something that feels like that.  I wanted to deliver a movie that delivers on what it says it is. I think we succeeded and made it work.  And I must give credit to Beverly Cleary, who’s now in her 90s. She was generous and extraordinarily helpful, and gave us guidance and a strong sense of what would work for her vision, which we all respected. I do think we made it work.</p>
<p><a href="http://awfj.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/300allencleary.jpg" ><img src="http://awfj.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/300allencleary.jpg" alt="" title="300allencleary" width="300" height="200" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5045" /></a>
<p>(PHOTO: Beverly Cleary and Elizabeth Allen. Courtesy Elizabeth Allen)</p>
<p><STRONG>JENNIFER MERIN:</STRONG> The casting couldn’t have been better. There’s a real sense of family ties among the actors, all of whom seem to connect so genuinely and joyfully with the material and each other. It’s not easy to achieve that when you’re working with kids and a cat. So, how’d you do it?</p>
<p><STRONG>ALLEN:</STRONG> I agree that the cast is exceptional, and they‘re all actors who respond so strongly to this kind of high caliber material. They were also all familiar with the book and have a relationship with it, so that gave each of them an instant back story &#8212; they had years of history with the story, and that‘s such a luxury for an actor, and for a director. </p>
<p><STRONG>MERIN:</STRONG> Did you find the kids and cat difficult to work with?</p>
<p><STRONG>ALLEN:</STRONG> Kids and cats are always challenging. Everyone needs to have infinite patience, and it really helps is everyone is there for the right reasons &#8212; that they love the project.  Working with Joey King (playing Ramona) and Selena Gomez (playing Beezus) is about as good as it get when you’re working with young actors. They both have amazing maturity and share a great sense of responsibility and work ethic. The infants &#8212; we had twins playing the baby &#8212; were somewhat more challenging. But it was the cat who was just so bad. We all know that cats are just not cooperative, and this cat was no exception. But even so, we got lucky, especially in the scene where they’re making the world’s longest picture &#8212; the cat wouldn’t stay put where he was supposed to be, but wound up wandering along the length of the picture with his tail up, and it was perfect. </p>
<p><STRONG>MERIN:</STRONG> That scene was wonderful. Was it difficult to shoot? And what’s become of the world’s longest picture? Will it go on display?</p>
<p><STRONG>ALLEN:</STRONG> You know, we actually couldn’t find the world’s longest picture, so they’re making a replica of it. Also, I do have a digital copy that can be printed out. But I don‘t know what we‘ll do with it eventually. </p>
<p>That scene seems to be everyone‘s favorite, as we’ve seen at our test screenings. It seems to resonate with everyone. I think of it as the film’s centerpiece because it brings together Ramona and Beezus’ conversation about coloring outside the lines, and it also shows the father’s &#8212; Bob Quimby’s &#8212; reconnecting with his youthful dream and regenerating his passion for art.</p>
<p><STRONG>MERIN:</STRONG> Speaking of art, the cinematography is wonderful in the way in which it captures the charm and quirkiness of the characters and reveals relationships….</p>
<p><STRONG>ALLEN:</STRONG> That’s John Bailey. He’s a living legend, and it was wonderful to have the opportunity to work with him. You learn from him all the time. The detail and his focus are fabulous. The way he used lighting to create a sparkle in the eyes of characters when they look at each other is amazing &#8212; you hardly notice it, but it really lights up the screen.</p>
<p><STRONG>MERIN:</STRONG>  There are some differences, some additions to the story. Did you feel you had to update it?</p>
<p><STRONG>ALLEN:</STRONG>  Actually the changes we chose to make in adapting the story turned out to be quite relevant. We came up with the plot contrivance of Bob Quimby (John Corbett) being downsized and the possibility of the family losing their house, and then the whole mortgage crisis occurred and the situation became real for so many families. At the screenings we’ve had so far, people have thanked me, saying that we’ve shown a positive way that a family can and does deal with the crisis.  </p>
<p>But we were very deliberate, too, in the decision to keep Beverly Cleary’s time stamp on all the elements of the film, and Beverly was influential in this approach. We don’t have any trendy clothes or hair styles. We don’t have any cell phones and the girls don’t do any texting. We don’t even have any flat screens.  We just felt it was important to stay in the touch with the original time frame of the book.</p>
<p><STRONG>MERIN:</STRONG> I’m glad you did. This is a great family film, and I’m glad you did decide to take the project. Do you have a particular interest in this genre? </p>
<p><STRONG>ALLEN:</STRONG> Actually, it’s new territory for me.  I began my career by making a short film &#8212; a calling card, if you will &#8212; which was about a bunch of boys beating the crap out of each other, and intentionally reflected a masculine sensibility. It was shocking and athletic and &#8212; perhaps because I’m a woman &#8212; got a lot of attention for me because it was unique and unexpected. It gave me a leg up, in a way, over some very talented male directors I went to school with.  </p>
<p><STRONG>MERIN:</STRONG> Do you think that women directors will have more opportunity in Hollywood now that Kathryn Bigelow has won an Oscar?  Will they have more chances to direct the big budget action films and thrillers?</p>
<p><STRONG>ALLEN:</STRONG> I hope so. I’m thankful to Elizabeth Gabler, the President of Fox 2000, who gave me my first break with “Aquamarine,“ and even though that didn’t do very well, took a chance on me with “Ramona and Beezus” &#8212; which, by the way, had many action movie elements &#8212; stunt doubles, action sequences, animals and infants, but no visual effects and green screens. But family movies are ten times harder to direct than people think they are. So, having finished “Ramona and Beezus,“ I feel quite prepared to direct a big budget action movie.</p>
<p><STRONG>MERIN:</STRONG> Is that what you have planned next?</p>
<p><STRONG>ALLEN:</STRONG> No. Actually, I’m directing a romantic comedy, which is a genre that I really do love.  It’s called “Is He The One?,” and it’s a chance to delve into the psychology of romance. It’s also for Elizabeth Gabler and Fox 2000. We’re just getting started on it, and I’m really looking forward to the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-elizabeth-allen-talks-%e2%80%9cramona-and-beezus%e2%80%9d-filmmaking-and-women-in-hollywood-jennifer-merin-interviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - &#8220;Ramona and Beezus&#8221; - Review by Susan Granger</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-ramona-and-beezus-review-by-susan-granger/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-ramona-and-beezus-review-by-susan-granger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Susan Granger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews and Criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[beverly cleary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ramona and beezus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[susan granger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For 60 years, six-to-12 year-old children have enjoyed books by Beverly Cleary, so it’s
actually quite surprising that it’s taken this long to bring any of them to the big screen.
Her ordinary, thoroughly believable characters dwell on Klickitat Street in Portland,
Oregon, which is a real street, not far from her childhood home.
Mischievous, imaginative nine year-old Ramona [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 60 years, six-to-12 year-old children have enjoyed books by Beverly Cleary, so it’s<br />
actually quite surprising that it’s taken this long to bring any of them to the big screen.<span id="more-5075"></span><br />
Her ordinary, thoroughly believable characters dwell on Klickitat Street in Portland,<br />
Oregon, which is a real street, not far from her childhood home.<br />
Mischievous, imaginative nine year-old Ramona Quimby (Joey King) lives with<br />
her sedate, strait-laced, often exasperated 15 year-old sister Beatrice (Disney Channel<br />
star Selena Gomez), whom she’s nicknamed Beezus, and toddler sister Roberta (twins<br />
Aila &#038; Zanti McCubbing). They’re watched over by loving parents, Dorothy (Bridget<br />
Moynahan) and Robert (John Corbett), along with funky Aunt Bea (Ginnifer Goodwin)<br />
and her old flame, Hobart (Josh Duhamel). Ramona’s guided by her sensible third-grade<br />
teacher, Mrs. Meacham (Sandra Oh), and observes ‘first love’ between Beezus and Henry<br />
Huggins (Hutch Dano). It’s a tumultuous time in the Quimby household – and when<br />
Ramona gets her own room, she finds a grate through which she overhears her parents<br />
talking about the financial insecurity that the family faces.<br />
Adapted by Laurie Craig (“Ella Enchanted”) and Nick Pustay, who combined episodes<br />
from all eight Ramona books, and directed by Elizabeth Allen (“Aquamarine”), it tackles<br />
some serious themes for tweens, like Robert’s losing his job, Dorothy’s working overtime<br />
and how the family is stressed, fearing that they may have to move away. That’s unusual<br />
in a pre-teen movie but certainly appropriate to the current recession, particularly as<br />
Ramona sees her father struggling with his identity.<br />
Filmed in Vancouver, there’s an unmistakable Pacific Northwest atmosphere. Yet,<br />
it plays like a sitcom, better suited to the small screen than the large; that’s particularly<br />
evident in the heroine’s periodic, low-budget CGI daydreams. Trivia note: back in 1988,<br />
Ramona came to life in a short-lived Canadian TV series, starring a then-nine-year-old<br />
On the Granger Movie Gauge of 1 to 10, “Ramona and Beezus” is a generic, gingerly<br />
gentle 5. But exasperating, endearing Ramona and her family should enjoy a long and<br />
prosperous life ahead on the DVD shelf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-ramona-and-beezus-review-by-susan-granger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - Iconic Women In Film - Diana Saenger comments</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-iconic-women-in-film-diana-saenger-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-iconic-women-in-film-diana-saenger-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diana Saenger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Essays and Features]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[diana saenger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[greta garbo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iconic women in film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jean harlow]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[julia roberts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[katharin hepburn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[liuse rainer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[luise rainer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[meryl streep]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scarlett Johanson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scarlett johansson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years ago the word Hollywood conjured up images of glamour, legend and famous actresses and actors. Movie fans clamored for movie magazines that had in-depth stories about the stars’ lives and couldn’t wait to see them on the big screen. Movies were designed around star power and if the plot was exceptional – it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago the word Hollywood conjured up images of glamour, legend and famous actresses and actors. Movie fans clamored for movie magazines that had in-depth stories about the stars’ lives and couldn’t wait to see them on the big screen. Movies were designed around star power and if the plot was exceptional – it was added value to the experience.<span id="more-5077"></span>
<p>
Today the word Hollywood has more significance when followed by the words video, sign, tans, or walk of fame. Little about the name creates an imaginary world of make believe in our minds as it once did. Fan magazines today have little to read and mostly include paparazzi photographs of celebrities walking their kids or dogs or what 30 of them wore at the last big event.
<p>
At the beginning, my list of stand-out actresses totaled more than 50 names. Challenged to narrow down the list, I looked for certain criteria: What made them famous? Were they more than just beauties? How did they sustain their careers? What did their name add to a picture?
<p>
That question was recently answered when I had the privilege of seeing the 100-year-old, two-time Oscar winner <strong>Luise Rainer </strong>at the Turner Classic Movies film festival. Flown from England to talk about <i>The Good Earth</i> (1937), even the non-star-struck Robert Osborne glowed with awe as he began to interview her. Rainer immediately told everyone her hearing aid had just broken, but a pad of paper took care of that as the still-beautiful actress answered each question with detail, passion and a keen sense of humor. She was still a true star and a pure delight talking about everything from making <i>The Good Earth</i> to her favorite star, Greta Garbo. “I loved Greta Garbo because she was so beautiful, she had a face like … Aphrodite’s, everything was beautiful up, but she had big feet,” Rainer said.
<p>
Swedish star <strong>Greta Garbo </strong>had a short film history in the U.S. She made only 25 films. The fact that she garnered four Oscar nominations – <i>Romance</i>, <i>Anna Christie</i>, <i>Camille</i>, <i>Ninotchka</i> – in a 10 year period speaks volumes about her work. Garbo was a woman in control of her own destiny first and as an actress second. A consummate pro she needed few second takes and had command over who could and could not be on the set. Her enigmatic personality, along with her flawless beauty, were major draws that made her one of MGM’s best early assets.
<p>
Among today’s actresses I would compare <strong>Jessica Lange </strong>to Garbo. Lange had a bumpy beginning trying to recreate Fay Wray’s role as the temptress who brought King Kong to his<br />
death in the 1976 remake. But the beauty with a warm and generous laugh make friends with the camera and it has brought her a successful career with 36 major films and two new ones in the works. Lange has been nominated for six Academy Awards and won two – <i>Tootsie</i>, <i>Blue Sky</i>. She surprised audiences with her intense and seductive performance opposite Jack Nicholson in <i>The Postman Always Rings Twice</i>. I think she should have been nominated for this performance but the fact that it was only her fourth film may have influenced Academy members. Another role I thought she deserved a nomination for was <i>Rob Roy</i> (1995). As the 18th Century Scottish Mary MacGregor, Lange fed her character the love, will of iron and courage her husband (Liam Neeson) needed to battle for his country. Lange splits her enormous talent between films, TV and the Broadway stage.
<p>
Holding her own among legendary actors such as John Wayne and John Ford would take an<br />
actress with the spirit and confidence of <strong>Maureen O’Hara</strong>. She could steal a scene from a rough and tumble cowboy in an instant – maybe something she leaned from taking fencing lessons at age six. She was a classic beauty whether playing opposite a tortured sole in <i>The Hunchback of Notre Dame</i> or being a damsel in distress opposite Tyrone Power in <i>The Black Swan</i>. Although she never received any Academy nods, O’Hara certainly had an impact on her fans. The young Irish actress oozed confidence, something co-star Charles Laughton saw when he helped her land a role in Alfred Hitchcock’s <i>Jamaica</i> (1939), which launched her career. Of course her flaming red hair and peaches and cream complexion didn’t hurt either. It’s rumored that Herbert T. Kalmus, inventor of the Technicolor process, found favor by lending his process to films she appeared in. Again, she was as strong a woman as an actress, setting milestones in women earning the same money as men. She even ran an airline company when her husband aviator Charles Blair died.
<p>
<strong>Julia Roberts</strong> embodies many of O’Hara’s qualities. Although Roberts wanted to be a<br />
veterinarian, her parents were actors, playwrights and taught acting lessons to children. So it wasn’t a surprise when she stepped in front of the camera for her two-word debut supporting role along side her brother Eric in <i>Ted Blood</i> (1989). Her dazzling career includes 46 films, with nine in development. Roberts’ range of depth in widely different genres – thrillers, dramas comedies, animation voices and even playing Tinkerbell in <i>Hook</i> (1991) – mimics talents we saw in O’Hara. As a heartfelt young bride with diabetes, Roberts earned her first Academy-Award nomination for <i>Steel Magnolias</i> (1989). Her incredibly funny portrayal of a hooker in <i>Pretty Woman</i> (1990) earned her second Oscar nomination. Roberts struck gold when she won the Academy Award in 2000 for <i>Erin Brockvich</i>, for her riveting portrayal of the real life unemployed single mother, Erin Brockovich, who brought a major corporation to its knees. Like O’Hara’s ability to hold her own with strong male stars Roberts had no problem getting a nod of approval from her co-stars George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Andy Garcia and Matt Damon when they appeared in the <i>Ocean’s</i> films. While some female stars might think of themselves in Roberts shoes as a BMW, she does not. In one interview I did with her where James Gandolfini described her as a Ferrari, she likened herself to a Volkswagen – “one of the original beetle convertibles, nice noise, you know it’s coming, good gas mileage!” she said.
<p>
<strong>Jean Harlow</strong> broke into Hollywood in her teens. <strong>Scarlett Johansson </strong>appeared in her first film at age 10. Both woman treaded lightly up the success ladder. Harlow appeared in early talkies, then comedy films and finally the World War I film <i>Hell’s Angels</i> (1930) that opened the door to stardom. Johansson was nominated for an Independent Spirit Award for Best Female Lead for her performance in 1996&#8217;s <i>Manny &#038; Lo</i>. She was 12. Slowly the consummate actress began to surface in films such as <i>Lost in Translation</i>, <i>Girl with a Pearl Earring</i>, <i>A Love Song for Bobby Long</i> and <i>Match Point</i>, all of which earned her Golden Globe nominations.
<p>
From 1930 on, Harlow became a blond bombshell. Her films <i>Platinum Blonde</i> (1931), <i>Red-Headed Woman</i> (1932) and <i>Bombshell</i> (1933), awarded her with the accolade of Hollywood’s first true “sex symbol.” Johansson’s sex appeal didn’t surface as quickly as the awareness that she was becoming an actress of stature. She is often hailed by critics as an actress who can stand still and wordlessly convey the essence of a scene. But she was begging to sizzle. In <i>The Prestige</i> she was provocative. She was sultry and pouty in <i>The Other Boleyn Girl</i>, flirty and amusing in <i>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</i>. Playing the Black Widow in the new <i>Iron Man 2</i> won’t win Johansson the title of Hollywood’s best sex symbol, but her coy, teasing temptress of a character certainly moves her into the running. And in her most recent appearance at the Tony Awards where she won the Tony for Best Featured Actress in a Play (<i>A View From the Bridge</i>) her luminous beauty ranked right up there with Jean Harlow.
<p>
Two of the most iconic actresses of all time are <strong>Katharine Hepburn</strong> and  <strong>Meryl Streep</strong>. Hepburn was nominated for 12 Academy Awards for Best Actress in a Leading Role and won four. Streep tops those nominations coming in with 16 for Best Actress in a Leading or Supporting Role.
<p>
Almost becoming the poster child for nominations, Streep has taken home Oscar only twice – for <i>Kramer vs. Kramer</i> (1969) and <i>Sophie’s Choice</i> (1982). But the two actresses have more in common than their awards.
<p>
Hepburn has been called the “Best Classic Actress of the 20th Century” and is ranked #1 woman in AFI&#8217;s “50 Greatest Movie Legends.” It was her second movie, <i>A Bill of Divorcement </i> (1932), opposite John Barrymore, that earned Hepburn an RKO contract. Only one year later in <i>Morning Glory</i> (1933), her role as a stage actress earned Hepburn her first Academy Award. While her next movie, <i>Little Women</i> (1933), became one of the most successful pictures of its time, Hepburn was getting some rather negative publicity. She lost immediate favor with both audiences and filmmakers because of her erratic behavior – refusing to sign autographs or wear makeup, and wearing pants at time before it was considered appropriate for women to do so. Yet her intriguing gravely voice and growing exceptional talent helped blaze a trail of film successes for the strong-willed woman. From comedic movies such as <i>The Philadelphia Story</i> (1940) to serious roles as in <i>The African Queen</i> (1951), Hepburn earned many Oscars, had affairs with prominent male actors and remained true to her own feisty personality. For a woman who would rival Hepburn’s film successes, how odd that Hepburn actually professed a dislike for Streep.
<p>Unlike Hepburn’s often flawed reputation, Streep is highly admired by fans, filmmakers and co-stars. She shies away from admiration, brushing off the greatest actress fame with the nonchalance of whisking bread crumbs from her lap. Yet with a career that spans 32 years and her more Academy Award nominations than pins on a bowling lane; the label makes sense. Comedies dramas, historicals and even musicals – there’s not a genre that Streep hasn’t tackled without totally immersing us in her character. She’s also a master of accents as she’s proved more than once and of late in her Oscar nominated role for <i>Julie and Julia</i>. Streep touched our hearts in <i>Sophie’s Choice</i> (1982); inspired us in <i>Silkwood</i> (1983); surprised us with her singing and dancing talents in <i>Mamma Mia</i> (2008); touched our romantic hearts in <i>The Bridges of Madison County</i> (1995) and highly amused us in <i>The Devil Wears Prada</i> (2006).
<p>
In addition to being one of America’s favorite actresses, Streep is admired for her ability to manage a busy career but keep her love of family foremost. John Patrick Shanley, who directed Streep in <i>Doubt</i>, probably summed Streep up best when he said, “Meryl is a protean actress. Her heart and her soul and her imagination are wide open. It’s like capturing lightning in a bottle when you’re shooting with her because every take is completely different, yet each one is justified and grounded in the very depths and truths of the character.”<P><br />
So many iconic actresses could not be covered in one article, so watch for parts two and three of this fascinating subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/23/awfj-women-on-film-iconic-women-in-film-diana-saenger-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - &#8220;Inception&#8221; - Review by Tricia Olszewski</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-inception-review-by-tricia-olszewski/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-inception-review-by-tricia-olszewski/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews and Criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inception]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tricia olszewski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Nolan’s concept is as irresistible as its execution. Read more>>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Nolan’s concept is as irresistible as its execution. <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/film/2010/07/15/reviewed-inception/#more-26911" target="new" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.washingtoncitypaper.com');">Read more>></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-inception-review-by-tricia-olszewski/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - &#8220;Inception&#8221; - Review by Susan Granger</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-inception-review-by-susan-granger/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-inception-review-by-susan-granger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Susan Granger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews and Criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inception]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[susan granger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    Just as James Cameron fashioned a far-distant world in “Avatar,” Christopher Nolan has created an even more intriguing inner world in this terrifying new sci-fi thriller. 
    Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a master of extraction. Trained in high-stakes corporate espionage and the use of psychotropic drugs, he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>    Just as James Cameron fashioned a far-distant world in “Avatar,” Christopher Nolan has created an even more intriguing inner world in this terrifying new sci-fi thriller. <span id="more-5028"></span><br />
    Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a master of extraction. Trained in high-stakes corporate espionage and the use of psychotropic drugs, he steals thoughts that are buried deep in the subconscious when the mind is most vulnerable. Problem is: he’s now an international fugitive, unable to return to his family in the United States. So when a wealthy, mysterious businessman (Ken Watanabe) offers him a way home, Cobb agrees to perform a far more dangerous feat: to implant an idea in the brain of an industrialist heir (Cillian Murphy).<br />
    Clever, always inventive writer/director Christopher Nolan (“The Dark Knight,” “Memento”) is fascinated by the relationship between waking life and dreaming particularly, as he says, by the fact that “everything within a dream – whether frightening or happy or fantastic – is being produced by your own mind, and what that says about the potential of the imagination is quite extraordinary.”<br />
    As a result, Nolan’s stylish, illusory dreamscapes defy the laws of time and physics, like an arresting Parisian cityscape folding in upon itself and an eye-popping chase sequence with weightless participants bouncing off walls in zero gravity. While revealing a dazzling myriad of mercurial perils that lurk in the subconscious, Nolan never violates the ingenious internal logic of his complex, sophisticated concept.<br />
    Delivering a multi-layered performance, Leonardo DiCaprio (“Shutter Island”) embodies a desperate man, haunted by secrets, with Joseph Gordon-Levitt (“500 Days of Summer”) as his trusted colleague, handling the high-tech details. Marion Cotillard (“La Vie en Rose”) is Cobb’s late wife/the love of his life, and Ellen Page (“Juno”) is a brilliant architecture student who’s intrigued by the opportunity to design and build interlocking, maze-like structures that don’t exist in reality. Michael Caine, Tom Berenger, Pete Postlethwaite, Tom Hardy and Dileep Rao add pivotal support.<br />
    On the Granger Movie Gauge of 1 to 10, “Inception” is a tantalizing, tension-filled, mind-bending, time-twisting 10. It’s the most exciting thrill-ride of the summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-inception-review-by-susan-granger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - &#8220;The Girl Who Played With Fire&#8221; - Reviewed by Tricia Olszewski</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-reviewed-by-tricia-olszewski/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-reviewed-by-tricia-olszewski/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Olszewski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews and Criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the girl who played with fire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tricia olszewski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The strikingly original character Larsson brought to life is, alas, already getting predictable. Read more>>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The strikingly original character Larsson brought to life is, alas, already getting predictable. <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/39377/reviewed-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-and-restrepo-two" target="new" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.washingtoncitypaper.com');">Read more>></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-reviewed-by-tricia-olszewski/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - &#8220;The Girl Who Played with Fire&#8221; - Review by Cynthia Fuchs</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-review-by-cynthia-fuchs/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-review-by-cynthia-fuchs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Fuchs</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews and Criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cynthia fuchs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the gril who played with fire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In The Girl Who Played with Fire, Lisbeth is no longer the sometimes mesmerizing sidekick. Instead, she&#8217;s the very obvious, and less mesmerizing, center. Read more>>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In The Girl Who Played with Fire, Lisbeth is no longer the sometimes mesmerizing sidekick. Instead, she&#8217;s the very obvious, and less mesmerizing, center. <a href="<br />
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/128076-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-flickan-som-lekte-med-elden/" target="new">Read more>></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-review-by-cynthia-fuchs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - &#8220;The Girl Who Played With Fire&#8221; - Review by Susan Granger</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-review-by-susan-granger/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-review-by-susan-granger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Susan Granger</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews and Criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfjwomen on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[susan granger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the girl who played with fire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    Like Stieg Larsson’s “Millennium” trilogy, you need to read/see “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” in order to understand this sequel. In the first movie, crusading Stockholm business journalist, Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) enlisted the help of a punk, pierced-and-tattooed computer hacker, Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace), to solve a 40 year-old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>    Like Stieg Larsson’s “Millennium” trilogy, you need to read/see “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” in order to understand this sequel. In the first movie, crusading Stockholm business journalist, Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) enlisted the help of a punk, pierced-and-tattooed computer hacker, Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace), to solve a 40 year-old cold case.<span id="more-5031"></span><br />
    As this installment begins, sullen Lisbeth is on a Caribbean island, culminating her world travels after absconding with a fortune. Then on the eve of Millennium magazine’s publication of a provocative article about prostitution and sex trafficking in Sweden, its two authors are murdered. And feisty Lisbeth’s fingerprints are found on the gun, which belonged to the vile, abusive guardian (Peter Andersson) who raped her. Soon after, he’s found dead. All evidence for the triple murder points to secretive, chain-smoking Lisbeth, who must elude capture while searching for legal/police records that will prove her innocence. Meanwhile, Mikael - from whom Lisbeth has been estranged - is committed to unearthing details from her tragic, tortured past, which involves uncovering an evil conspiracy and revealing the identity of a Russian spy (Georgi Staykov) who defected to Sweden and the ruthless, hulking blond enforcer (Micke Spreitz) who protects him.<br />
    Screenwriter Jonas Frykberg and director Daniel Alfredson do their best to condense the late Stieg Larsson’s complex, multi-layered concept, condemning the sexism and corruption that he felt permeated Swedish society. Indeed, the original title of the first book was “Men Who Hate Women.” The fact that this film was assembled from two 90-minute made-for-TV movies perhaps explains the flat photography and murky lighting.<br />
    What makes this visually brutal thriller extraordinary is its avenging, androgynous heroine, perfectly embodied by Noomi Rapace. Let’s hope Sony retains sinewy, riveting Rapace in its upcoming Hollywood adaptation of this immensely popular trilogy.<br />
    In Swedish with English subtitles, on the Granger Movie Gauge of 1 to 10, “The Girl Who Played With Fire” is a smoldering, suspenseful 7, whetting the appetite for “The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest,” set for release in October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-the-girl-who-played-with-fire-review-by-susan-granger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AWFJ Women On Film - How Movies Repaint the Image of the American Families - Carrie Rickey comments</title>
		<link>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-how-movies-repaint-the-image-of-the-american-families-carrie-rickey-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-how-movies-repaint-the-image-of-the-american-families-carrie-rickey-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Rickey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Essays and Features]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Women on Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative families]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[annette bening]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awfj women on film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[carrie rickey]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[julianne moore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lisa cholodenko]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the kids are all right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awfj.org/?p=5091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If  Norman Rockwell were alive today, when there&#8217;s a smorgasbord of options for building a clan, his picture of the American dinner might resemble the post-nuclear family of The Kids Are All Right, Lisa Cholodenko&#8217;s comedy opening Friday. Here are two lesbian mothers, their two teenagers - each the offspring of one of them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If  Norman Rockwell were alive today, when there&#8217;s a smorgasbord of options for building a clan, his picture of the American dinner might resemble the post-nuclear family of The Kids Are All Right, Lisa Cholodenko&#8217;s comedy opening Friday. Here are two lesbian mothers, their two teenagers - each the offspring of one of them - and the sperm-donor dad gathered around the picnic table, getting to know each other over burgers and chips 18 years after bio-dad&#8217;s deposit at the sperm bank.<a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/magazine/20100722_Hollywood_paints_an_updated_portrait_of_the_American_family_.html" target="new" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/article/www.philly.com');">Read more>></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://awfj.org/2010/07/13/awfj-women-on-film-how-movies-repaint-the-image-of-the-american-families-carrie-rickey-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
